Download Free Medical Cone Beam Computed Tomography PowerPoint Presentation

Cone Beam Computed Tomography PowerPoint Presentation

DOWNLOAD MEDICAL POWERPOINT PRESENTATION

About This Presentation

Description : A systematic review on incidental findings in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans

Tags : CBCT,cone beam computed tomography

Published on : May 13, 2021 | Views : 6744 | Downloads : 14

Shareable Url :

Embed Code :

Comment

Transcript

Slide 1-

A systematic review on incidental findings in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20180396
Slide 2-

Introduction
Slide 3-

CBCT Advantages: Proper resolution for Large structures Intricate tooth anatomy Multiplanar imaging 2D & 3D images → different perspective Different FOV Large FOV: Maxilla, mandible, sinus, airway, cranial structures Disadvantages: Lack of soft tissue window Higher image noise Higher radiation
Slide 4-

Incidental findings Any occult finding discovered upon assessing radiographic image taken for other purposes High prevalence in CBCT scans Aim of this study evaluation of the frequency and risk of IFs using CBCT
Slide 5-

Methods and materials
Slide 6-

PRISMA Statement Search Criteria Databases PubMed, Embase (through Ovid), MEDLINE (through Ovid),Web of Science, and Scopus Primary keywords cone-beam computed tomography incidental finding Risk of Bias: STROBE guidelines
Slide 7-

ppt slide no 7 content not found
Slide 8-

Phase 1 Inclusion criteria Human participants of all ages IFs of head & neck area English peer-reviewed articles Exclusion criteria Case reports & case series Craniofacial syndrome Studies focusing on one type of IF
Slide 9-

Phase 2 Inclusion criteria Studies focusing on one field of dentistry Exclusion criteria Studies not presenting a dental focus Systematic reviews
Slide 10-

ppt slide no 10 content not found
Slide 11-

Methods and materials Phase 2 Inclusion criteria Studies focusing on one field of dentistry Exclusion criteria Studies not presenting a dental focus Systematic reviews
Slide 12-

Methods and materials Table 2
Slide 13-

ppt slide no 13 content not found
Slide 14-

Methods and materials
Slide 15-

ppt slide no 15 content not found
Slide 16-

Discussion
Slide 17-

Price et al TMJ findings more commonly found in older age Pette et al Vertebral pathological findings 28.67 times more in 65≤ years old participants Mutalik CBCT scan for dental implants is in tandem with an increase in an increase in age and IFs Damaskos IFs (e.g.: calcification of atherosclerotic plaques) increases with age Pliska et al & Drage et al Younger patients’ IFs: tooth impaction IFs: Highest frequency: mucous retention cyst (55.1%) Lowest frequency: malignancies (1.4%)
Slide 18-

Carotid Fat deposit accumulation → slowing down the blood of brain→ stroke Frequency 3 of 10 studies (2-11.6%) Allareddy et al: 57/1000 Pette et al: 37/318 Price et al: 17/300 The other 7 study? Cutting off the carotid space from FOV Not considering CAC as an IF Calcification of Atherosclerotic Plaque
Slide 19-

Damaskos et al (ACs): Intracranial: 161 of 484 (33.26%) Extracranial: 150 of 484 (30.99%) More frequent in male Increased with age Calcification of Atherosclerotic Plaque
Slide 20-

Pathologies & Malignancies At least 2 of 10 articles: Dentigenerous cyst: 0.6- 2.6% Ameloblastoma: 0.2- 0.8% OKC: 0.2- 0.5% Nasopalatine/ incisive canal cyst: 0.3-2.5% Giant cell lesions: 0.1-0.5% Allareddy et al (large sample size) Residual cyst (0.7%), Osteosclerosis (0.5%), cementoblastoma(0.4%), osteomyelitis (0.2%), radioosteonectosis (0.1%), chemoosteonecrosis (0.1%), odontoma (0.4%), periapical cyst (1.78%)
Slide 21-

Pathologies & Malignancies Total frequency of malignancy: 0.3%(Allareddy et al)- 1.4% (Warhekar et al) Allareddy et al’s malignancies: In sella region damaging sella turcica Metastatic lesions in breast & prostate Warhekar et al : Orofacial malignancies The importance of evaluation of CBCT scan beyond maxillomandibular regions Significant & critical to identify
Slide 22-

Non-threatening IFs Sinusitis 41.7%, 7 of 10 studies Endodontic lesions 11.8% Untreated → Bone loss, tooth loss, periodontal disease Loss of adjacent cortical plates, perforation of inferior alveolar canal Also can be evaluate by conventional radiographic tools
Slide 23-

CBCT Characteristics & Disadvantages Higher radiation Small FOV: 11-652 µSv Large FOV: 30-1073 µSv Conventional: <8.3 µSv Panoramic: 2.7-23 µSv Maxillomandibular CT: 180-2100 µSv Lack of soft tissue window Higher image noise Higher cost Main disadvantage: Dentists are accustomed to small FOV
Slide 24-

CBCT Characteristics & Disadvantages Primary evaluation tool: Conventional radiographs Secondary evaluation tool: CBCT scan
Slide 25-

Limitations Specific focus on a specialization of dentistry IFs not confirmed by lab results or biopsy Significant variation among reviewers 4 articles: 1 OMFR 4 articles: 2 independent OMFRs 1 article: not specified 1 article: 13 masked independent OMFRs Different CBCT machines, FOV, imaging parameters 4 of 10 articles explained the term of “incidental finding”
Slide 26-

Similar Articles Mutalik et al Possible missing of IFs due to: Large FOV & unfamiliarity of dentists for associated anatomical areas Solution: a holistic view by dentists & radiologists (first responders to critical findings)
Slide 27-

Similar Articles Edwards et al (2014) Same 5 articles IF frequency: Edwards: 24.6- 93.4% This article: 24.6- 94.3% Additionally 5 articles: published after 2012 → increase in CBCT use → more focus on IFs Same tools assessing the methodological quality Edwards: moderate to low in bias(60-93%) This article: moderate to low in bias(44-94%)
Slide 28-

Conclusion
Slide 29-

Importance of CBCT complete readings & diagnosis of IFs Risk of potential bias of all included studies due to the research design Primary evaluation tool: Conventional radiographs Secondary evaluation tool: CBCT scan The importance of evaluation of CBCT scan beyond maxillomandibular regions
Slide 30-

Thanks for your attention