Download Free Medical Cognitive Rehabilitation-Treatment and Efficacy PowerPoint Presentation

Cognitive Rehabilitation-Treatment and Efficacy PowerPoint Presentation

DOWNLOAD MEDICAL POWERPOINT PRESENTATION

About This Presentation

Description : Check out this medical presentation on Neurology, which is titled "Cognitive Rehabilitation: Treatment and Efficacy", to know about Cognitive Rehabilitation.

Tags : Neurology, Cognitive Rehabilitation, Treatment, Efficacy

Published on : Aug 18, 2021 | Views : 2408 | Downloads : 1

Shareable Url :

Embed Code :

Comment

Transcript

Slide 1-

Cognitive Rehabilitation: Treatment and Efficacy Rick Parente Ph.D. Towson University rparente007@yahoo.com
Slide 2-

Third Edition Available from: ProEd Publishers: 800-897-3202 June, 2010
Slide 3-

A Brief History Three traditions –Retraining - Compensation – Holistic Rehabilitation Egyptians – Medical problems are either treated, contended with, or not treated. Aphasia was not treated. Many still believe that it is not possible to treat cognitive deficits after TBI or stroke.
Slide 4-

Retraining – “Re-education” Sheppard Ivory Franz (1924) – Studied long-term changes in aphasia and hemiplegia recovery after long-term “nervous and mental re-education”. Wars – Walter Poppelreuter (1917), Kurt Goldstein (1942), Oliver Zangwill (1947), Alexander Luria, (1948)/63), Yahuda Ben-Yishay, and Leonard Diller (1983).
Slide 5-

Influence of Kurt Goldstein Long-term treatment and follow-up Variability in behavior is the rule not the exception. Psychometric monitoring Importance of fatigue Need to train compensation strategies The importance of therapeutic transfer
Slide 6-

Influence of Alexander Luria Study of the organizational structure to the brain. CRT involved reorganizing the brain. Use of drugs to stimulate recovery. Focus on areas of the brain that remained intact.
Slide 7-

Influence of Yehuda Ben-Yishay Holistic rehabilitation – Work with the entire human rather than specific deficits. Patients given behavioral and cognitive templates to direct behavior. The problem of awareness
Slide 8-

Lessons Learned Recovery is a slow arduous process requiring motivation, repetition and sustained practice (Franz, Goldstein). Recovery is seldom 100%. The most practical rehabilitation efforts involve teaching patients to compensate (Golstein, Luria). The best practice is one that treats the person holistically and for whom the effects carry over to the real world (Goldstein, Ben-Yishay). Recovery does not occur without awareness (Prigatano).
Slide 9-

Systems of CRT Stimulation therapy Process training Attention/Concentration Training Strategy Training Nutrient and Drug Treatment Prosthetic-Orthotic Device Domain-Specific Training Invisible Aids
Slide 10-

Efficacy: Does any of this actually work?
Slide 11-

Efficacy vs Effectiveness? Efficacy is the potential for beneficial change. How well the treatment works in a laboratory. Effectiveness is the practical utility of the treatment How well a treatment works in the practice of medicine.
Slide 12-

Hierarchy of Research Evidence After Rohling et al., 2011
Slide 13-

Efficacy of CRT Several Systematic Studies of CRT Efficacy “A Deep Literature” 655 articles through 1997 and an additional 315 published from 1998 to 2002 plus 50-150 recent articles through 2017 Binder, L. M., Rohling, M. L., & Larrabee, G. J. (1997). A review of mild head trauma. Part I: Meta-analytic review of neuropsychological studies. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 19, 421-431 Cicerone, K.D., Dahlberg, C., Kalmar, K., Langenbahn, D.M., Malec, J.F., Bergquist, T.F., Felicetti, T., Giacino, J.T., Harley, J.P., Harrington, D.E., Herzog, J., Kneipp, S., Laatsch, L., & Morse, P.A., (2000). Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: recommendations for clinical practice. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 81(12), 1596-1615. Cicerone, K.D. (2002) Remediation of `working attention’ in mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 16(3), 185-195. Cicerone K.D., Dahlberg, C., Malec, J.F., Langenbahn, D.M., Felicetti, T., Kneipp, S., Ellmo, W., Kalmar, K., Giacino, J.T., Harley, J.P., Laatschm L., Morse, P.A., Catanese, J. (2005). Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: updated review of the literature from 1998 through 2002. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 86(8), 1681-1692. Frencham, K. A., R., Fox, A. M., & Marybery, M. T. (2005). Neuropsycyhological studies of mild traumatic brain injury Park, N. W. & Ingles, J. W. (2001). Effectiveness of attention rehabilitation after an acquired brain injury: A meta-analysis. Neuropsychology, 15, 199-210. Robey, R. R. (1998). A meta-analysis of clinical outcomes in the treatment of aphasia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Researcher, 41, 172-187 Rohling, M.L., Faust, M. E., Beverly, B. & Demakis, G. (2009). Effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation following acquired brain injury: a meta-Analytic re-examination of Cicerone et al.’s (2000, 2005) systematic review. Neuropsychology, Vol 23(1), Jan, 2009 pp. 20-39. Rohling. M. L, Binder, L.M., Demakis, G. J., Larrabee, G. J. Ploetz, D. M. & Langhinrichsen-Rohlin. J. (2011). A Meta-analysis of neuropsychological outcomes after mild traumatic brain injury: re-analysis and reconsiderations of Binder et al. (1997), Frencham et al. (2005 and Pertab et al. (2009). The Clinical Neuropsychoolgist, 25(4) 608-623.
Slide 14-

The Questions of Efficacy Does cognitive rehabilitation improve cognitive functioning after neurological injury? Are some treatment modalities more efficacious than others? Are some types of cognition more amenable to recovery with CRT? What variables moderate the recovery process and the efficacy of CRT? Does efficacy translate into effectiveness?
Slide 15-

Synthesis of Meta-Analytic Studies and Systematic Reviews: Questions and Answers Q? – Does CRT improve cognitive functioning after neurological injury? A - CRT does produce a small but significant treatment effect that cannot be attributed to the passage of time. A - Mild TBI has a negligible effect on neuropsychological functioning in the long-term?
Slide 16-

Synthesis of Meta-Analytic Studies and Systematic Reviews: Questions and Answers Q? - What variables moderate the recovery process and the efficacy of CRT? A – Depends on how you define recovery. A - Significant moderators of recovery are: type of injury, amount of damage, and age.
Slide 17-

Synthesis of Meta-Analytic Studies and Systematic Reviews: Questions and Answers Q? – Are some treatment modalities more efficacious than are others? A - Of the various domains originally discussed by Cicerone (2000-2005), meta-analytic studies provide evidence for 3 of them: visual/spatial training, attention training, and language training. There is less consistent evidence for the efficacy of memory and comprehensive training
Slide 18-

Synthesis of Meta-Analytic Studies and Systematic Reviews: Questions and Answers Q? – Does efficacy translate into effectiveness? A - Depends on how you measure effectiveness. e.g., Quality of life, Return to work, Independent living
Slide 19-

Meta-Analysis of 24 Recent Attention Studies (Rebecca Bernard) Overview of Results Meta-analysis of 24 studies of attention since 2005. Significant corrected effect size for pre-post change in treatment group. Small but significant ES for control group pre-post change.
Slide 20-

Meta-Analysis of 24 Recent Attention Studies (Rebecca Bernard) ESs largest for studies of selective attention. ES largest in stroke populations and smallest but least variable in TBI populations.
Slide 21-

A Meta-Analytic Assessment of 23 Recent Memory Studies (Madison Elliott) 23 studies of memory retraining published since 1990. Significant overall effect size across the studies that included a comparison of treatment to control conditions. Significant ES in the control conditions where the participants did not receive any treatment, i.e., the ES was simply due to the passage of time.
Slide 22-

A Meta-Analytic Assessment of 23 Recent Memory Studies (Madison Elliott) Comparison of treatment groups indicated that the largest ESs occurred in studies of stroke patients, Lowest occurred in studies of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Results indicate that memory rehabilitation is an effective therapeutic intervention. However, significant improvement also occurs spontaneously over time.
Slide 23-

A Meta-Analytic Assessment of 12 Studies of Language Therapy (Zack Mitlos) 12 studies of “communications training” published since 1990. Significant overall effect size across the studies that included a comparison of treatment to control conditions.
Slide 24-

A Meta-Analytic Assessment of 12 Studies of Language Therapy (Zack Mitlos) ES largest in stroke populations and smallest but least variable in TBI populations. Significant ES in the control conditions where the participants did not receive any treatment, i.e., the ES was simply due to the passage of time.
Slide 25-

Systematic Review of Pediatric CRT Studies Parente, Vaidya & Tawari) Studies of pediatric CRT generally report more improvement relative to studies of children where recovery occurs simply due to the passage of time. Several predictors of return of function have been identified and replicated, e.g., age at injury, family related variables, injury severity, and number of lesions the child sustains.
Slide 26-

Systematic Review of Pediatric CRT Studies Lessons Learned Therapies involving attention training, using prosthetic devices, or that involve some tangible reward generally produce efficacious treatments after pediatric TBI. Severity of injury and age at the time of injury are perhaps the best predictors of persistent executive difficulties. A strong family support structure facilitates recovery.
Slide 27-

Implications of Research for Therapists Best to start patients in treatment as soon as possible. Age inversely related to recovery Older patients do benefit from CRT – especially if they are stroke patients.
Slide 28-

Implications of Research for Therapists Targeted specific interventions are more effective than comprehensive non-targeted interventions. Interventions that target language and attention likely to produce greatest improvement. Stroke patients will likely recover faster and more completely relative to TBI patients.
Slide 29-

Problems With Interpretation A “deep literature” but shallow data base of usable articles. Over-reliance on pre-post test designs for estimating effect size. Ecological validity of the measures used in the studies. Few studies of symptom validity, motivation, and incentive effects. Few replications
Slide 30-

Personal Perspective What works and what doesn’t
Slide 31-

What Works: The things I’ve learned so far Gradual step-by-step therapy Eclectic treatment Prosthetic devices Academic remediation Functional skills training
Slide 32-

What Works - continued Individualized mnemonics Changing life-long habits Creating incentives and personal relevance of treatment
Slide 33-

What Works - continued Rehearsal training Social skills integration training Nonverbal perception
Slide 34-

Commonly Used Prosthetic Devices Digital recorders Smart Phones Timex/Microsoft watch Sticky note pads Personal signs Appointment calendars Automatic bill payment Device controllers for the home Cognitive Art
Slide 35-

Cognitive Enhancing Nutrients and Drugs Examples of nutritional Supplements (OTC) Acetyl-L-carnitine DMAE DHEA Ginkgo Biloba Ginsing Phosphatidylserine Pyritinol Prevagen
Slide 36-

Examples of Drug Treatments (Prescription) Axona Aricept Hydergine Nootropics Stimulants Neuropeptides Tacrine Physostigmine Vinpocitine 9/18/17
Slide 37-

Social Skills Training: Topics Paying Attention Remembering Names Listening Eye contact Controlling Anger Controlling Impulses Solving problems Making Decisions Non-Verbal Communication
Slide 38-

Non-Verbal Communication Tone of Voice Body Language Facial Expressions Personal Space
Slide 39-

What Does not Work Doing nothing Short-term treatment Most stimulation therapies Most Freudian oriented psychotherapies
Slide 40-

The Right Questions To Ask Does the treatment have demonstrated efficacy? Is there any evidence of effectiveness i.e., carryover to the real world Does the person see relevance to the treatment? Is it possible to measure improvement? Is there a clear therapeutic goal? Can the client or family continue the treatment without you?