Download Free Medical WHO Country Covid Intra-Action Review PowerPoint Presentation

WHO Country Covid Intra-Action Review PowerPoint Presentation

DOWNLOAD MEDICAL POWERPOINT PRESENTATION

About This Presentation

Description : This presentation by the World Health Organization (WHO) is a support for the conduct of different countries Intra-Action Review (IAR). This document needs to be adapted to the specific context of the country.

Tags : COVID-19, coronavirus, virus, WHO, Country, Covid, INTRA-ACTION REVIEW , IAR, coronavirus

Published on : Apr 19, 2021 | Views : 1991 | Downloads : 1

Shareable Url :

Embed Code :

Comment

Transcript

Slide 1-

Preamble - Instructions This presentation is a support for the conduct of a Country COVID-19 Intra-Action Review (IAR). It needs to be adapted to the specific context of the country. The team lead the IAR will have to complete the yellow sections in this presentation prior to the review (see slides 2, 12, 13, 15).
Slide 2-

INTRA-ACTION REVIEW (IAR) Country Dates COVID-19
Slide 3-

ppt slide no 3 content not found
Slide 4-

Adapted from After Action Review guidance Qualitative review of actions taken to respond to an emergency as a means of identifying best practices, gaps and lessons learned Focuses on functionality Voluntary Evaluation of real event – after an event Involving all those involved in the event to discuss the actions taken in an open and honest environment “… implement in-depth reviews of significant disease outbreaks and PH events. (IHR Review Committee Recommendations - Resolution WHA68.5 in May 2015)
Slide 5-

WHAT IS AN INTRA-ACTION REVIEW? An Intra-Action Review is a qualitative review of actions undertaken so far to respond to an ongoing emergency as a means of identifying gaps, lessons and best practices in order to improve the response plan.
Slide 6-

WHAT IS AN INTRA-ACTION REVIEW? A good practice for continuous collective learning by bringing together the relevant stakeholders to critically and systematically analyse actions undertaken so far in the response
Slide 7-

WHAT IS AN INTRA-ACTION REVIEW? IAR are a constructive, collective learning opportunity, where stakeholders of an emergency response within the health sector or between sectors, can find common ground on how to improve preparedness and response capability for the current emergency
Slide 8-

Principles Participative Open and honest spirit Space for experience sharing and mutual learning Analysis of systems and processes Oriented towards the identification of solutions A compilation of participants’ perceptions
Slide 9-

What an Intra-Action Review is not? Intra-Action Reviews are not: an external evaluation of an individual’s or a team’s performance; an opportunity to criticize, blame or judge individuals. Intra-Action Reviews do not measure performance against benchmarks or key performance standards.
Slide 10-

KEY PHASES CARRIED OUT DURING THE REVIEW OBJECTIVE OBSERVATION Establish how actions were actually implemented during the response, in contrast to how they are supposed to or usually happen, according to plans and procedures. Identify the gap between planning and practice. Analyse what worked well and what worked less well and why. Identify actions to strengthen or improve performance and how to follow-up. ANALYSIS OF GAPS & BEST PRACTICES AND CONTRIBUTING FACTORS IDENTIFICATION OF AREAS OF IMPROVEMENT
Slide 11-

Introduction: Response plan and actual timeline of the response INTRA-ACTION REVIEW OVERVIEW Step 1: What went well? What went less well? Why? Step 2: What can we do to improve the COVID-19 response? Step 3:The Way Forward
Slide 12-

Objectives Insert the objectives for this review (objectives can be found in your concept note)
Slide 13-

Scope of the COVID-19 Intra-Action Review List the functions/pillars to be covered Period covered by this Intra-Action Review
Slide 14-

Introduction: Response plan and actual timeline of the response INTRA-ACTION REVIEW OVERVIEW Step 1: What went well? What went less well? Why? Step 2: What can we do to improve the COVID-19 response? Step 3: The Way Forward
Slide 15-

Overview of the response Presentation of the response by the Ministry of Health Suggested points to present: Overview of existing capacities prior to the COVID-19 response Capacities developed for and during the COVID-19 response Response strategy Response timeline during the period under review
Slide 16-

Introduction: Response plan and actual timeline of the response INTRA-ACTION REVIEW OVERVIEW Step 1: What went well? What went less well? Why? Step 2: What can we do to improve the COVID-19 response? Step 3: The Way Forward
Slide 17-

Step 2 : What happened during the response? Step 1 : What went well? What went less well? Why? STRENGTHS CHALLENGES of the response & (root cause analysis see next slide)
Slide 18-

Step 2 : What happened during the response? STRENGTHS IMPACTS CAUSES CAUSES CAUSES CHALLENGES IMPACTS CAUSES CAUSES CAUSES LIMITING & ENABLING FACTORS 5 WHY’s
Slide 19-

Using the trigger questions, identify the challenges and best practices during the response For each challenge and best practice, identify the impact this has had on the response during the period under review For each challenge and best practice, identify limiting factors (for challenges) and facilitating factors (for best practices) Identify no more than 6 key challenges and 6 key best practices
Slide 20-

Improved coordination and sharing of information for the early detection of suspected/ confirmed cases and for monitoring contacts Relationship had been established prior to the response Willingness of all stakeholders to undertake regular meetings Political and financial support from central level Response not coordinated between partners, health authorities and the central level Duplication of activities and effort Lack of a plan for district level coordination Partners not participating in coordination meetings Coordination at local level ineffective Regular cross-border coordination meetings
Slide 21-

Important definitions Best practice: Something that was done during the COVID-19 response that improved performance or had a positive impact Examples: Development of new SOPs for COVID-19 diagnosis Organization of cross-border meetings during the COVID-19 response to facilitate better coordination
Slide 22-

Important definitions Challenge: Job, duty or situation that is difficult during the COVID-19 response because you must use a lot of effort, determination, and skill in order to be successful. Examples: Lack of coordinated communication between MoH and partners. Limited capacity for COVID-19 testing at subnational level.
Slide 23-

Remember the objective is: To identify the best practices and the key challenges but also To identify and institutionalize new capacities Developed so far during the response e.g. new SOP, new equipment purchased, new skills learned…etc. NEW
Slide 24-

Introduction: Response plan and actual timeline of the response INTRA-ACTION REVIEW OVERVIEW Step 1: What went well? What went less well? Why? Step 2: What can we do to improve the COVID-19 response? Step 3: The Way Forward
Slide 25-

Institutionalize best practices Address challenges Development of specific activities: to build on enabling factors to address the limiting factors
Slide 26-

All activities need to be practical and realistic Several activities might be necessary to address a single challenge or a best practice Not all best practices or challenges need an activity
Slide 27-

Refer to the challenges, best practice, impact and factors to help identify key activities to overcome challenges and institutionalize best practices.
Slide 28-

Introduction: Response plan and actual timeline of the response INTRA-ACTION REVIEW OVERVIEW Step 1: What went well? What went less well? Why? Step 2: What can we do to improve the COVID-19 response? Step 3: The Way Forward
Slide 29-

In the plenary session, discuss and agree on the following: Identification of: what can be addressed immediately to improve the ongoing response; what can be done in the mid and long-term to improve response to the next waves of the COVID-19 outbreak. Establishment of an Intra-Action Review Follow-up team Process to document progress in implementing the recommendations Approach to ensure engagement of senior leadership
Slide 30-

Thank for your contribution to saving lives!